- Fink đ§
- Posts
- Sorry Americans, you're poorer than we realised
Sorry Americans, you're poorer than we realised
or how the US government lost a trillion dollars yesterday
How the US government lost more than a trillion dollars yesterday
Why the past isnât a good guide for the future (& the present isnât much better)
And the big question - Does it matter if you âtime the marketâ?
đ§ The Big Brain
Uhhhh, whereâd my savings go?
If youâve been feeling inadequate about your measly account balance while the media banged on about TRILLIONS of pandemic excess savings, youâre gonna LOVE this.
See, economists, analysts & academics have spent months parsing data to try and figure out just how much of a buffer US households have to shield them from a downturn.
The pandemic stimulus injected some extra uncertainty into the calculations, but the general belief at the end of the last year was that those excess savings would be gone by nowâŚ
Now, weâre in September and that picture is really no clearer. It all depends who you talk toâŚ
Have a chat with Moodyâs and theyâll tell you âthat excess savings peaked at $2.5 trillion in September 2021 and have declined $1.2 trillion to $1.3 trillion through July. By this estimate, 53% of excess savings remainâ
Get on the phone to the San Francisco Fed & theyâll tell you that those savings are basically goneâŚ
Their estimates show that excess savings peaked at $2.1 trillion and have since declined to virtually nothing, $190 billion in June
Moodyâs know we love charts so they made this to compare the two views:
PffftâŚ. Whatâs a trillion dollars between friends?
If youâre not convinced by either of these measures, call in the authority on the matter: The US Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
âHi guys whatâs your take on these excess savings?â
BEA: âYeah, weâve been meaning to contact you actually. Thereâs been a few, uh errorsâ
âEveryone makes mistakes guys. Iâm sure itâs not that badâ
BEA: âWe were out by $1.1 trillionâ
Yep, as part of a big data revision, the BEA discovered that Americans Saved $1.1 Trillion Less Than Previously Thought From 2017-2022
This doesnât mean economic Armageddon.
In the real world, nobodyâs going to miss what was never there in the first place.
The concept of âexcess savingsâ has always been flawed.
Basing anything on assumptions layered on top of more assumptions, and at a time of huge uncertainty to boot isnât a good recipe.
One other metric may be a more accurate gauge of consumer strengthâŚ
The Bank of America account data:
Two things leap out:
All groups well above the pre-pandemic level
The recent trend is clearly declining
Remember, inflation has devalued this by around 20% so although the level is currently higher, going back to the 2019 (100) level would be a huge decrease in purchasing powerâŚ
Which obviously wouldnât be great for a consumer economy. For now though, thatâs still tomorrowâs problem.
đ Premium subs: Look out for a report on the consumer discretionary sector later today
⥠The Spark
Looking to the past as a model for the future âmay misleadâ
So says Dirk Schumacher. And heâs talking about stuff like this:
While eurozone inflation is currently running at 4.5%, Dutch inflation PLUNGED to just 0.2%.
Well done ECB, problem solved!!
If only. See, although energy prices fell by a whopping 38% YoY in the Netherlands, food prices rose by 10%.
Itâs still oh so messy.
Germanyâs economy is slumping too, opening the door to a second recession of the year, while the ECB âexpects a rebound in economic activity in 2024ââŚ
With large divergences across the 20 eurozone nations, setting policy is a tough task. Will there be a rebound?
"The rise in interest rates has been much quicker than in previous times so looking to the past as a model may mislead"
đĄ The Lightbulb
Timing The Market
The evergreen investing adage âit's not about timing the market, but about time IN the marketâ is supposed to encourage investors to drop the ego & forget about being clever.
Just buy stocks every month or year and let the compounding magic do the work. Donât try and buy bottoms, sell tops or any of that nonsense. Just keep buyingâŚ
Investec explain why here đ
đ§ Here is a fantastic video from @Investec explaining how time in the market > timing the market
â Fink.Money (@Fink_Money)
2:37 PM ⢠Sep 13, 2023
Schwab chimed in with their 2 cents on this too (with a twist)
They took five investing styles, added some cringe surnames, and shared the results.
Each received $2,000 at the beginning of every year for the 20 years ending in 2022 and left the money in the S&P 500
Pretty impressive returns for compounding 24k total investments. About those styles:
Peter nailed every low.
Ashley invested on day 1 of each year.
Matthew dollar cost averaged each month (2000 / 12 = 166.66 per month).
Rosie bought the peak every single year.
Larry stayed in cash/treasury bills waiting for market dips that never quite dipped enough to entice him in.
Rosie's results also proved surprisingly encouraging. While her poor timing left her $15,214 short of Ashley (who didn't try timing investments), Rosie still earned about three times what she would have if she hadn't invested in the market at all (like Larry)
There you have it. Even top-ticking the S&P 500 every single year is better than sitting on the sidelinesâŚ
Even nailing the ding-dong low doesnât perform that much better than just sticking the cash in on the first trading day of the year.
Tempting as it is to sit out when the pictureâs a bit gloomy, the best way to invest during uncertainty is soooo easy đ