• Fink 🧠
  • Posts
  • Week Ahead - Brexit, EU Council & ECB, China Trade

Week Ahead - Brexit, EU Council & ECB, China Trade

‌‌A blockbuster week awaits.

  • Brexit 'Endgame'

  • EU Council Meeting

  • ECB Meeting

  • U.S. Government Funding/Fiscal Stimulus

  • China Trade

We've got to start with Brexit haven't we?

Monday will see a barrage of headlines, sources, leaks, & opinions.

“This is the final throw of the dice” a British source close to the negotiations said.

“There is a fair deal to be done that works for both sides but this will only happen if the EU is willing to respect the fundamental principles of sovereignty and control.”

EU Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier said that the Sunday talks with his British counterpart David Frost would show whether a new trade deal could be struck.

In a joint statement after their call, Johnson and von der Leyen said that “no agreement is feasible” if differences on the three thorny issues of governance, fisheries and competition rules, known as the level playing field, were not resolved.

Negotiations were paused on Friday after hopes of a deal earlier in the week evaporated, with the British team saying that the EU had made demands incompatible with its sovereignty and warning that the talks could end without agreement.

Mr Johnson and Mrs Von der Leyen have agreed to speak again on Monday night, the last scheduled meeting between the UK and EU.

Another UK source said that, if a deal was not agreed by then, the talks would probably collapse, but this was disputed by EU sources.

The Prime Minister will now press ahead by publishing two draft laws – the Internal Market Bill and the Taxation (Post-Transition Period) Bill – on Monday and Tuesday, which will breach international law by rewriting parts of the Withdrawal Agreement which governed the UK's exit from the EU in January in a move that could further strain relations.

Emmanuel Macron, the French president, had set the tone earlier in the week after a meeting with Alexander De Croo, the Belgian prime minister, declaring: “France will not accept a Brexit deal that does not respect our long-term interests.”

The point was made more forcefully on Friday by Clément Beaune, Macron’s Europe minister. “I still hope we can have a deal but we will not accept one that is bad for France,” he told Europe 1 radio. “If there were a deal and if it wasn’t good, we would oppose it with our veto right.”

The contrast could not have been greater with the relative silence of other European leaders — Angela Merkel, notable among them — who have refrained from providing a running commentary on the talks. “For the chancellor, and that hasn’t changed in recent weeks, the willingness to compromise is needed on both sides,” the German leader’s spokesman, Steffen Seibert, told a briefing a few hours after Beaune’s interview. ‌‌“If you want to have a deal then both sides need to move towards each other. Everybody has their principles — there are red lines, that’s clear — but there’s always room for compromise.”

Political theatre at its finest.

France playing bad cop, Germany the good cop.

Now for the final act... How might it play out from here?

Monday: Parallel to the negotiations, the internal market bill returns to the House of Commons.

Brace yourself for a parliamentary stand-off.

Much of the action in the Lords and the Commons this week will revolve around the UK Internal Market Bill, where the government is pledged to reverse extensive changes made by peers.

(This is the bill which contains measures that overrule parts of the withdrawal agreement signed with the EU last year.)

Normally, peers gracefully hoist the white flag, if MPs don't accept amendments they've made to legislation; but this time, the controversial law-breaking powers in the bill looks set to galvanise them into resistance.

On Monday, the government majority in the Commons will vote to reject the Lords amendments; on Wednesday peers may put them, or a version of them, back in again, and on Thursday MPs will take them out for a second time.

This could go on for some time. (Remember, a bill has to be approved by both houses, before it can become law.)

And the same arguments will probably be reprised with this week's other big measure, the Taxation (Post Transition Period) Bill, where the same law-breaking issues are said to apply - although, because its a money bill, the Lords can't amend it.

The EU will likely complain about these bills and cite them as proof that the UK is negotiating in bad faith etc. etc.

And so it goes on.

Gaming out the 'story' of the negotiations, I don't see a breakthrough tomorrow, or even this week, and I concur with this (worth reading in full) from Nordea's Andreas Steno Larsen;

We expect a no deal, but no tariffs scenario (effectively a last-minute extension of the transition period) with a framework paper for further negotiations being agreed upon before New Year

But before all of that, we need some more drama.

A screenplay in bullet points;

  • Monday-Wednesday: UK & EU talks break down without an agreement - no deal seems like a genuine possibility.  

  • Thursday/Friday: EU Council meeting - 'EU CRISIS CRUNCH TALKS' headlines

  • Negotiations reconvene - last chance to get a deal, 18th December new deadline

  • Deal not reached before deadline, signs of progress, issues still remain, extend transition period to avoid cliff edge

Don't know if I'll get the big film deal.  

Interestingly, Nordea note that even in the alternative scenario (no deal, tariffs come into effect), a GBP dip will be bought;

Should the no deal, added tariffs scenario, against our expectations, unfold, then the GBP would sell-off swiftly into the deadline, but we expect it to be a massive “buy the rumour, sell the fact” event with a sharp move higher in EUR/GBP followed by a clear GBP recovery as markets will quickly chase the momentum towards a deal as both parties will suddenly have clear incentives to cooperate around a deal.

That last line is the crux of my viewpoint on this.

For now, the political consequences of agreeing a 'bad deal' far outweigh the easy option of kicking the can.

Recent GBP resilience to negative Brexit headlines suggest that this optimistic viewpoint (or similar) is widely shared.

Ignoring the specifics, a cliff edge will be avoided and it's all political theatre for now.

This thread is a good summary of how things stand.

 12/ So, why the big row now? The optimists on the EU side say it's all a straw man to create the cover for a deal by mid-week. The pessimists warn the divergences are very real and there's a 'tough road ahead'. The UK insists it's serious and the EU must budge from these demands.— Nick Gutteridge (@nickgutteridge) December 6, 2020 

Taking a look at the daily chart, GBPUSD sold off on Friday.

For the PA traders, the shooting star candlestick could tempt shorts into the market, but it pays to be cautious.

The PA is most likely a reflection of weekend risk management rather than anything substantial so I would be cautious trying to read too much into it.

The previous week saw a similar Friday selloff;

Then GBP rallied 250 pips to the upside.

Direction on the weekly chart is clear.

In the early part of the week, GBP is likely to drift lower if uncertainty creeps in/continues whilst buyers remain in 'wait and see' mode.

As soon as there is a sniff of talks continuing (or even a deal) I would expect that trend to reverse.

EU Council Meeting (10th-11th Dec)

On the agenda; COVID-19, climate change, trade, security and external relations.

Brexit aside, there are two pressing matters.

Internally, Hungary & Poland are blocking the recovery fund and budget.

This needs solving, otherwise the EU will be forced to operate on emergency monthly budgets from January.

The solution is to compromise, or leave Hungary & Poland isolated.

The European Union will leave Poland and Hungary out of its economic recovery plan if the two countries continue to resist efforts to link the disbursement of 1.8 trillion euros of funds with rule-of-law provisions, a French cabinet minister said.

European Affairs Minister Clement Beaune said such a move was legally complex, but possible.

“Our position is clear: we will not sacrifice either the recovery or the rule of law,” Beaune told the Journal du Dimanche. “There is no question of reviewing the mechanism which links the two.”

“It’s not a threat but the direct consequence of the absence of a new budget if they maintain their veto on the package,” he said.

There has been talk of a 'two tier' EU for some time, and this came back to the fore again last week, when Portugal's PM Costa suggested shrinking and simplifying the union.

This is a good read on those comments and the EU's ever-present existential crisis.

This is just how the EU does things.

Lurch from one crisis to the next, fumbling and bumbling half-solutions, but never actually solving anything fully.

Mr Beaune's threat of 'consequences' rings hollow.

Is this yet more empty words before another half-solution is fudged?  

Then there's Turkey.

And Erdogan.

Of late, he has said France’s President Emmanuel Macron needed his head examined and in a reference to European leaders: “You are fascists in the true meaning of the world. You are veritably the link in the Nazi chain.”

In a separate exchange;

“We see ourselves nowhere else but in Europe. We contemplate to build our future together with Europe.”

Furthermore, he claimed: “We believe that we do not have any problem with any country or institution that cannot be solved through politics, diplomacy and dialogue.”

He also urged the EU not to be a tool of “explicit hostility” against Turkey.

At the upcoming meeting the EU will need to;

decide whether or not to impose sanctions on Turkey for its aggressive policy in the Eastern Mediterranean and violation of Greece and Cyprus’ maritime zones.

The Council already agreed at the beginning of October that the EU would latest at its December meeting make use of the full panoply of sanctions available to it if Turkey continued with its unilateral actions and breach of international law.

The European Parliament has in a resolution adopted by 631 votes called for the Council to impose tough sanctions on Turkey in response not only to its illegal actions in the Eastern Mediterranean but also its activities in Varosha, a fenced-off suburb of Famagusta in Cyprus, seized after the Turkish occupation in 1974.

There is no doubt that sanctions should be levied, but whether they will be is another question entirely.

ECB Meeting

I will send out a full preview tomorrow.

ING's expectations;  

  • An increase in the PEPP programme by up to 500bn euro to extend this programme until the end of 2021

  • An increase of the monthly APP purchases from 20bn euro to 40bn euro, open-ended

  • An extension of the generous TLTRO interest rate by six to 12 months

  • An increase in the tiering facility to exempt a greater part of the banks’ liquidity from the negative deposit rate

  • Potentially, including so-called Fallen Angels (corporate bonds downgraded during the crisis) into the corporate bond purchasing programme.

China Trade (November)

Will be closely watched for signs of a continuing recovery.

Last month, exports beat the 9.3% consensus to grow by 11.4%.

The consensus is for this month's reading to jump to 12%.

Imports did not match up to estimates last time around, but expectations were perhaps too high after a blockbuster September.

Expectations of a solid 6.1% growth this month.

As long as the trend continues with no signs of slowing too much, the China recovery story will be supported.

In the U.S...

Robert Redfield, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said Americans faced a winter like no other because of high infection rates across the country.

“The reality is that December, January and February are going to be the most difficult time in the public health history of this nation, largely because of the stress that it is going to put on our healthcare system,” Dr Redfield said.

The market continues to look beyond the virus, and 'stimulus hopes' are back in fashion for the market rallies on... headlines.

By which they mean it could be presented to the house, be bounced around and argued about for a while, then something vaguely resembling the original version could be passed within the next month or so. Maybe.

There are a lot of moving parts within this.

  • Democrats largely favour $1,200 direct stimulus cheques, which are not included in this bill

  • Republicans are wary of giving too much away before the Georgia senate runoff votes on January 5th

  • Expanded unemployment benefits under the CARES act expire on December 26th

Government funding for most federal agencies also expires on December 11th.

Congressional negotiators have made progress on how to divvy up around $1.4 trillion to be spent by Sept. 30, 2021, the end of the current fiscal year, according to a House of Representatives Democratic aide.

But more granular details are still unresolved and votes by the full House and Senate on a massive funding bill may come close to bumping up against that Dec. 11 deadline.

Full details on that here;

We also have BoC & BCB meetings, CPI data from the U.S., China & Germany, German ZEW, and mercifully, only a handful of central bank speakers.

Here's the full calendar;